
by Mia Caielli and Anna Mastromarino
The projection of institutional, cultural, linguistic, religious and ethnic pluralism on the judiciary seems to be leading to two different phenomena, both aimed at protecting diversity and recognizing community interests. On the one hand, some countries have been establishing special religious or/and ethnic special courts. On the other, some composite and fragmented legal systems have decided to preserve the institutional unity of the judiciary, incorporating social pluralism in the composition of judicial organs by imposing criteria for the selection of both constitutional and ordinary judges related to, for example, gender, ethnicity, territorial origin... (continues)
Dopo un difficile compromesso, fumata bianca al Consiglio europeo sui principali posti apicali nell'Unione europea
Carlo Curti Gialdino (03/07/3019)
The future of the international organization in Africa: legal/institutional profiles and functional perspectives
CALL FOR PAPERS (09/12/2019)
Circolazione dei dati personali e autonomia privata
Raffaella Messinetti (27/11/2019)
Trent'anni dopo
Giovanni Orsina (13/11/2019)
Il giudice tra creatività interpretativa e esigenze di legalità e prevedibilità
Roberto Garofoli (30/10/2019)